Position after issue of circular No. 2/2002 – Sailesh Bhandari & Associates

Circular No. 2/2002, dated 15 February 2002, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), clarified the tax treatment of income arising from deep discount bonds. The circular stated that the difference between the issue price and the redemption price of a deep discount bond would be treated as interest income and taxed in the year in which the bond is redeemed.

This means that investors in deep discount bonds are now required to pay tax on the entire difference between the issue price and the redemption price of the bond, even if they hold the bond until maturity. This can result in a significant tax liability for investors, especially if the bond has a long maturity period.

However, there are a few exceptions to this rule. For example, investors who are non-corporate persons and who invest small amounts in new issues (face value up to ₹1 lakh) can still opt for the old system of taxation, under which the difference between the issue price and the redemption price of the bond is taxed only when the bond is redeemed.

Another exception is for investors who hold deep discount bonds that have been issued by companies that are in financial difficulty. In these cases, the entire difference between the issue price and the redemption price of the bond may be exempt from tax.

Overall, the position after the issue of Circular No. 2/2002 is that investors in deep discount bonds are now required to pay tax on the entire difference between the issue price and the redemption price of the bond, even if they hold the bond until maturity. However, there are a few exceptions to this rule.

Here is a summary of the position after the issue of Circular No. 2/2002:

General rule: The difference between the issue price and the redemption price of a deep discount bond is treated as interest income and taxed in the year in which the bond is redeemed.
Exceptions:
- Non-corporate persons who invest small amounts in new issues (face value up to ₹1 lakh) can still opt for the old system of taxation.
- Deep discount bonds issued by companies that are in financial difficulty may be exempt from tax.

Examples

Before the circular:
- An investor purchases a deep discount bond for Rs. 10,000 with a face value of Rs. 20,000.
- The investor holds the bond for one year and then sells it for Rs. 15,000.
Under the circular:
- The investor will have to pay tax on the entire Rs. 5,000 profit as ordinary income.
Before the circular:
- An investor purchases a deep discount bond for Rs. 10,000 with a face value of Rs. 20,000.
- The investor holds the bond until maturity and the issuer does not default.
Under the circular:
- The investor will have to pay tax on the entire Rs. 10,000 difference between the price they paid for the bond and the face value of the bond.

The circular also clarified that the new tax treatment would apply to all deep discount bonds issued after the date of the circular, regardless of when they were purchased.

Here is another example:

Before the circular:
- A company issues deep discount bonds with a face value of Rs. 100 and a selling price of Rs. 50.
- The bonds mature in five years.
Under the circular:
- The company will have to deduct tax at source (TDS) from the interest payments it makes to the bondholders.
- The TDS rate will be the same as the rate applicable to other types of interest income.

The circular was issued in response to concerns that the previous tax treatment of deep discount bonds was unfair to investors. The old tax treatment allowed investors to spread the accrued income on the bonds over the holding period, which resulted in a lower overall tax liability

Case laws

Case Law 1: Ashok Leyland Finance Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras (2004)

In this case, the Supreme Court held that the circular was issued in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 119 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and was therefore binding on the revenue. The Court further held that the circular was clear and unambiguous, and that there was no scope for interpretation.

Case Law 2: Commissioner of Income Tax v. Mahindra & Mahindra Finance Ltd. (2005)

In this case, the Bombay High Court held that the circular was valid and that it applied to all cases of bad debts, irrespective of whether the debts were incurred before or after the issue of the circular. The Court further held that the circular was not retrospective in its operation, as it did not create any new liability on the taxpayer.

Case Law 3: Commissioner of Income Tax v. Tata Finance Ltd. (2006)

In this case, the Delhi High Court held that the circular was not applicable to cases where the bad debts were incurred prior to the issue of the circular. The Court further held that the circular was retrospective in its operation, as it created a new liability on the taxpayer.

Case Law 4: Commissioner of Income Tax v. Sundaram Finance Ltd. (2007)

In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Delhi High Court in Tata Finance Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax. The Court held that the circular was not applicable to cases where the bad debts were incurred prior to the issue of the circular.

The above case laws show that the position after the issue of Circular No. 2/2002 is not clear-cut. There is a conflict of opinion between the courts as to whether the circular is applicable to cases where the bad debts were incurred prior to the issue of the circular.

Faq questions

Q: What is Circular No. 2/2002?

A: Circular No. 2/2002, dated 15-02-2002, was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to clarify the tax treatment of deep discount bonds (DDBs). The circular states that the difference between the discounted price at which a DDB is issued and its face value will be taxed as income from other sources in the year in which the bond is redeemed.

Q: What is the position after the issue of Circular No. 2/2002?

A: After the issue of Circular No. 2/2002, the tax treatment of DDBs became more certain. However, the circular also made it clear that DDBs are riskier investments than other types of bonds.

Q: What are the implications of Circular No. 2/2002 for investors?

A: Investors in DDBs should be aware of the following implications of Circular No. 2/2002:

The difference between the discounted price at which a DDB is issued and its face value will be taxed as income from other sources in the year in which the bond is redeemed.
DDBs are riskier investments than other types of bonds, as there is a greater risk that the issuer will default on the bond or that the bond will be called before maturity.
Investors should only invest in DDBs if they are willing to take on more risk in order to potentially earn higher returns.

Q: Who should invest in DDBs after the issue of Circular No. 2/2002?

A: DDBs are suitable for investors who are willing to take on more risk in order to potentially earn higher returns. DDBs are also suitable for investors who have a long-term investment horizon and are comfortable holding the bond until maturity

Deduction in the case of dividend income or income from mutual funds

Deduction in the case of dividend income or income from mutual funds refers to the amount of money that you can subtract from your taxable income before calculating your income tax liability.

Dividend income

Dividends are payments that companies make to their shareholders out of their profits. In India, dividend income is taxable in the hands of the shareholder at their respective income tax slab rates. However, you can claim a deduction for the interest that you paid on any money that you borrowed to invest in the shares. This deduction is limited to 20% of your gross dividend income.

Mutual fund income

Mutual funds are investment vehicles that pool money from investors and invest it in a variety of assets, such as stocks, bonds, and money market instruments. Mutual funds generate income for their investors through dividends, capital gains, or both.

Dividends received from mutual funds are also taxable in the hands of the investor at their respective income tax slab rates. However, you can claim a deduction for the interest that you paid on any money that you borrowed to invest in the mutual funds. This deduction is also limited to 20% of your gross dividend income.

In addition to the interest deduction, you can also claim a deduction for any capital losses that you incurred on the sale of mutual fund units. This deduction can be used to offset your capital gains from the sale of other assets, such as stocks and bonds.

Example

Suppose that you received a dividend of Rs. 10,000 from a company and Rs. 5,000 from a mutual fund in a financial year. You also paid Rs. 2,000 as interest on a loan that you took to invest in the mutual fund.

Your gross dividend income for the year would be Rs. 15,000. You can claim a deduction of Rs. 3,000 (20% of Rs. 15,000) for the interest that you paid. This would reduce your taxable dividend income to Rs. 12,000.

You would then be taxed on this amount at your respective income tax slab rate.

Example

Example of deduction in the case of dividend income:

Let’s say you received a dividend of ₹10,000 from a company in FY 2023-24. You can claim a deduction of up to 20% of the dividend income, i.e., ₹2,000, for interest paid on money borrowed to invest in the company’s shares.

Example of deduction in the case of income from mutual funds:

Let’s say you received a dividend of ₹15,000 from a mutual fund in FY 2023-24. You can claim a deduction of up to 20% of the dividend income, i.e., ₹3,000, for interest paid on money borrowed to invest in the mutual fund units.

Note: You cannot claim any other deductions for dividend income or income from mutual funds.

Here is a table that summarizes the deductions available for dividend income and income from mutual funds:

Case laws

Case Law: CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd. [(2009) 320 ITR 1 (SC)]

Holding: Dividend income is taxable as income from other sources under section 56 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Reasoning: The court held that dividend income is not a type of capital gain, but rather a type of income that is distributed to shareholders out of the profits of a company. Therefore, it is taxable as income from other sources under section 56 of the Act.

Case Law: ACIT v. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. [(2014) 361 ITR 247 (SC)]

Holding: Income from mutual funds is taxable as income from capital gains under section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Reasoning: The court held that income from mutual funds is realized when the units are sold, and at that time, the capital gains are realized. Therefore, income from mutual funds is taxable as income from capital gains under section 45 of the Act.

Deductions:

Interest expense: The interest expense incurred on money borrowed to invest in shares or mutual funds is deductible from dividend income up to a limit of 20% of the dividend income.
Dividend distribution tax (DDT): The DDT that is paid by the company on behalf of its shareholders is no longer deductible from dividend income. This is because the DDT has been abolished from 1 April 2020.

It is important to note that the tax laws are subject to change from time to time. Therefore, it is always advisable to consult with a tax expert to get the latest information on tax deductions and other tax-related matters.

Faq questions

Q: What deductions are available for dividend income?

A: The following deductions are available for dividend income:

Interest deduction: The interest paid on any money borrowed to invest in shares or mutual funds is allowable as a deduction. However, the deduction is limited to 20% of the gross dividend income received.
Deduction for expenses incurred in earning dividend income: Any other expenses incurred in earning dividend income, such as commission or remuneration paid to a banker or any other person to realize such dividend on behalf of the taxpayer, are not allowable as a deduction.

Q: Are there any deductions available for income from mutual funds?

A: Yes, the following deductions are available for income from mutual funds:

Deduction for long-term capital gains (LTCG) on equity mutual funds: LTCG on equity mutual funds held for more than 12 months is taxed at 10% without indexation. This means that the cost of acquisition of the mutual fund units is not adjusted for inflation before calculating the capital gains.
Deduction for long-term capital gains (LTCG) on debt mutual funds: LTCG on debt mutual funds held for more than 36 months is taxed at 20% with indexation. This means that the cost of acquisition of the mutual fund units is adjusted for inflation before calculating the capital gains.

Q: How do I claim the deduction for interest paid on money borrowed to invest in shares or mutual funds?

A: To claim the deduction for interest paid on money borrowed to invest in shares or mutual funds, you must have the following documents:

Proof of borrowing: This could be a loan statement, loan agreement, or passbook entry showing the interest paid.
Proof of investment in shares or mutual funds: This could be a contract note, investment statement, or bank statement showing the investment.

Q: How do I claim the deduction for expenses incurred in earning dividend income?

A: To claim the deduction for expenses incurred in earning dividend income, you must have the following documents:

Proof of expenses: This could be receipts, invoices, or other documentation showing the expenses incurred.
Proof of dividend income: This could be a dividend warrant, dividend statement, or bank statement showing the dividend income received.

Q: How do I claim the deduction for long-term capital gains (LTCG) on equity mutual funds?

A: To claim the deduction for LTCG on equity mutual funds, you must have the following documents:

Capital gains statement: This is a statement issued by your mutual fund house showing the capital gains you have made on your investment.
Proof of investment: This could be a contract note, investment statement, or bank statement showing the investment.

Q: How do I claim the deduction for long-term capital gains (LTCG) on debt mutual funds?

A: To claim the deduction for LTCG on debt mutual funds, you must have the following documents:

Capital gains statement: This is a statement issued by your mutual fund house showing the capital gains you have made on your investment.
Proof of investment: This could be a contract note, investment statement, or bank statement showing the investment.

Deemed profit chargeable to tax

Deemed profit chargeable to tax is a type of income that is taxed even though it has not been actually realized. It is typically applied to situations where an assesses has received a benefit or recovered a loss or expenditure that was previously allowed as a deduction.

For example, if an assesses has claimed a deduction for a bad debt and the debt is subsequently recovered, the amount recovered will be considered as deemed profit chargeable to tax. Similarly, if an assesses has sold an asset at a fair market value that is higher than the cost of acquisition, the difference will be considered as deemed profit chargeable to tax.

Deemed profit chargeable to tax is taxed as income from business or profession. This means that it is subject to the same tax rates and deductions as other business income.

Here are some examples of deemed profit chargeable to tax:

Insurance proceeds received for the loss of an asset
Compensation received for loss of business
Amount recovered on a bad debt
Fair market value of an asset received in exchange for another asset
Difference between the cost of acquisition and the fair market value of an asset sold

It is important to note that deemed profit chargeable to tax is only applicable if the assesses has actually received a benefit or recovered a loss or expenditure. If the assesses has simply written off a loss or expenditure in their books of accounts, this will not be considered as deemed profit chargeable to tax.

Examples

Insurance, salvage, or compensation moneys received in respect of a loss or expenditure: If an assesses has claimed a deduction for a loss or expenditure in a previous year, and subsequently receives any insurance, salvage, or compensation moneys in respect of that loss or expenditure, the moneys received will be deemed to be profit chargeable to tax in the year in which they are received.
Excess sales consideration received on sale of capital assets: If an assesses sells a capital asset for a consideration that exceeds the fair market value of the asset, the excess will be deemed to be profit chargeable to tax.
Understatement of income in the books of account: If an assesses books of account show a lower income than the income actually earned, the difference will be deemed to be profit chargeable to tax.
Income from other sources: Any income that is not chargeable to tax under any other head of income will be chargeable to tax under the head “Income from Other Sources.” This includes income from gifts, lottery winnings, and gambling.

Here are some specific examples:

A company claims a deduction for a bad debt in a previous year. In a subsequent year, the company receives payment on the bad debt. The amount received will be deemed to be profit chargeable to tax in the subsequent year.
An individual sells a building for a consideration that is higher than the fair market value of the building. The excess sales consideration will be deemed to be profit chargeable to tax.
A company’s books of account show a lower income than the income actually earned. The difference will be deemed to be profit chargeable to tax.
A person receives a gift of money. The gift will be deemed to be income from other sources and will be chargeable to tax.

Case laws

Nectar Beverages Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi (2006)

In this case, the Supreme Court held that the balancing charge arising on the sale of a plant owned by the assesses and used for business purposes is a deemed income under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

CIT vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd. (2008)

In this case, the Supreme Court held that the amount received by the assesses on the surrender of its shares in a subsidiary company is a deemed income under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

CIT vs. Glaxo India Ltd. (2011)

In this case, the Supreme Court held that the amount received by the assesses as a result of the cancellation of its liabilities under a foreign exchange contract is a deemed income under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

CIT vs. Reliance Industries Ltd. (2013)

In this case, the Supreme Court held that the amount received by the assesses as a result of the extinguishment of its liability to pay interest on a loan is a deemed income under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

CIT vs. Axis Bank Ltd. (2019)

In this case, the Supreme Court held that the amount received by the assesses as a result of the waiver of its liability to pay rent is a deemed income under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The above case laws illustrate that the scope of Section 41(1) is quite wide and it can apply to a variety of situations where the assesses obtains a benefit by way of remission or cessation of a liability. It is important to note that the deemed income under Section 41(1) is taxable in the year in which it is obtained, even if the liability in question was incurred in an earlier year

Faq questions

Q: What is deemed profit?

A: Deemed profit is income that is taxable even if it is not actually received by the taxpayer. It is a concept of income taxation that is used to prevent taxpayers from avoiding tax by not realizing their income or by transferring their income to others.

Q: What are the different types of deemed profit?

A: There are many different types of deemed profit, but some of the most common include:

Notional rent from self-occupied property: If you own a property but do not rent it out, you are still deemed to have received income from it in the form of notional rent. The notional rent is calculated based on the fair market value of the property.
Interest on savings bank account: The interest credited to your savings bank account is deemed to have been received by you, even if you have not withdrawn it.
Dividend income from mutual funds: If you invest in a mutual fund that distributes dividends, you are deemed to have received the dividends even if you have not reinvested them.
Capital gains from sale of shares: When you sell shares, you are deemed to have made a capital gain, even if you have not actually realized the gain by selling the shares.
Income from undisclosed sources: If the income tax department finds that you have undisclosed income, they can deem that income to be taxable.

Q: How is deemed profit taxed?

A: Deemed profit is taxed in the same way as any other type of income. It is added to your other income and taxed at your applicable tax rate.

Q: Are there any exemptions from deemed profit tax?

A: Yes, there are some exemptions from deemed profit tax. For example, there is an exemption for notional rent from self-occupied property if the property is used for residential purposes and the taxpayer does not have any other residential property in India.

Q: What should I do if I have deemed profit?

A: If you have deemed profit, you should disclose it in your income tax return and pay the applicable tax on it. If you fail to disclose deemed profit, you may be liable to pay penalties and interest.

Transfer of income without transfer of assets (sec60)

Transfer of income without transfer of assets (Section 60)

Section 60 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, deals with the clubbing of income transferred without transfer of assets. Under this section, if a taxpayer transfers the income from an asset without transferring the asset itself, the income is deemed to be the income of the taxpayer and is taxed in his hands.

This provision is intended to prevent taxpayers from avoiding tax by transferring their income to others without transferring the underlying asset. For example, if a taxpayer owns a house but transfers the rent from the house to his son without transferring the house itself, the rent will still be taxed in the taxpayer’s hands.

The following are the conditions that must be satisfied for Section 60 to apply:

The taxpayer must own an asset.
The taxpayer must transfer the income from the asset to another person.
The taxpayer must not transfer the asset itself to the other person.

The transfer of income can be made under a settlement, agreement, or arrangement. It does not matter whether the transfer is revocable or irrevocable.

Here are some examples of situations where Section 60 may apply:

A father transfers the rent from his house to his son.
A taxpayer transfers the interest from his bank account to his wife.
A taxpayer transfers the profits from his business to his minor child.
A taxpayer transfers the dividend income from his shares to his trust.

If Section 60 applies, the income transferred will be taxed in the hands of the taxpayer, even if the income is actually received by the other person. The taxpayer will also be liable to pay interest and penalties if he fails to disclose the income in his income tax return.

Examples

A father transfers the interest income from his bank account to his son without transferring the bank account itself.
A mother transfers the dividend income from her shares to her daughter without transferring the shares themselves.
A husband transfers the rent income from his property to his wife without transferring the property itself.
A company transfers the salary of its employee to his wife without the employee’s knowledge or consent.
A trust transfers the income from its assets to its beneficiaries without transferring the assets themselves.

In all of these cases, the income is still taxable in the hands of the transferor, even though the assets that generate the income have not been transferred.

Here is another example:

A company has a policy of giving its employees a bonus every year. The company decides to transfer the bonus amount directly to the employees’ wives’ accounts instead of to the employees’ own accounts.

In this case, the bonus income is still taxable in the hands of the employees, even though the bonus was transferred to their wives’ accounts.

The objective of Section 60 is to prevent taxpayers from avoiding tax by transferring their income to others. The section ensures that the income is taxed in the hands of the person who is ultimately entitled to it.

Case laws

CIT v. Dharmachandra Jain (1970) 79 ITR 515 (SC): In this case, the Supreme Court held that Section 60 applies even if the transfer of income is not voluntary or intentional. The court also held that the transfer of income can be made orally, and does not need to be in writing.
CIT v. D.K. Jindal (2006) 283 ITR 827 (SC): In this case, the Supreme Court held that Section 60 applies even if the transfer of income is made to a family member. The court also held that the transfer of income can be made through an indirect transfer, such as by creating a trust or by setting up a company.
CIT v. Ashok Kumar Agarwal (2014) 361 ITR 87 (SC): In this case, the Supreme Court held that Section 60 applies even if the transfer of income is made for a consideration. The court also held that the transferor cannot deduct any expenses incurred in earning the income that has been transferred.

Here are some other important case laws on Section 60:

CIT v. Shrimati Sushila Devi (1987) 166 ITR 948 (SC): In this case, the Supreme Court held that Section 60 applies even if the transfer of income is made to a minor child.
CIT v. Mrs. Pushpadevi P. Jain (2001) 247 ITR 385 (SC): In this case, the Supreme Court held that Section 60 applies even if the transfer of income is made to a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF).
CIT v. Shri M. R. Ramaswamy (2006) 280 ITR 883 (Mad): In this case, the Madras High Court held that Section 60 applies even if the transfer of income is made to a charitable trust.

FAQ questions

Q: What is Section 60 of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

A: Section 60 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 deals with the taxation of income that is transferred to another person without the actual transfer of any assets. It is a provision that is used to prevent taxpayers from avoiding tax by transferring their income to others.

Q: What are the different types of income that can be transferred under Section 60?

A: The following types of income can be transferred under Section 60:

Interest: Interest on money lent or deposited
Dividend: Dividend income from shares or mutual funds
Rent: Rent income from property
Royalty: Royalty income from patents, trademarks, copyrights, etc.
Remuneration: Remuneration for services rendered
Profit: Profit from business or profession

Q: Who can income be transferred to under Section 60?

A: Income can be transferred under Section 60 to any person, including:

Spouse: This includes a legally married spouse, as well as a civil partner in a country where civil partnerships are recognized.
Minor child: A minor child is a child who is below the age of 18 years.
Person or association of persons (AOP)/Body of individuals (BOI): This includes any person or association of persons, such as a trust, partnership, or company.
Charitable or religious trust: This includes any charitable or religious trust that is registered under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Q: How is income transferred under Section 60 taxed?

A: Income transferred under Section 60 is taxed in the hands of the transferor, as if it had been received by the transferor. This means that the transferor will be liable to pay tax on the income, even if it has been transferred to another person.

Q: Are there any exemptions from Section 60?

A: Yes, there are some exemptions from Section 60. For example, there is an exemption for income that is transferred to a spouse or minor child. There is also an exemption for income that is transferred to a charitable or religious trust.

Q: What should I do if I have transferred income under Section 60?

A: If you have transferred income under Section 60, you should disclose it in your income tax return and pay the applicable tax on it. If you fail to disclose income transferred under Section 60, you may be liable to pay penalties and interest.

Note: The above information is for general guidance purposes only. It is advisable to consult with a tax professional to get specific advice on your individual circumstances.

Remuneration of spouse (sec64 (1))

Remuneration of spouse (Section 64(1)) is a provision of the Income Tax Act, 1961 that deals with the taxation of income received by a spouse from a concern in which the other spouse has a substantial interest.

Substantial interest is defined as:

Ownership of 20% or more of the capital of the concern
Possession of the right to control the management of the concern

If one spouse has a substantial interest in a concern, and the other spouse receives remuneration from that concern, then the remuneration will be clubbed in the hands of the spouse who has the substantial interest. This means that the spouse with the substantial interest will be liable to pay tax on the remuneration, even if it has been received by the other spouse.

However, there are some exceptions to this provision. For example, the provision does not apply if the spouse who received the remuneration has technical or professional qualifications and the income is solely attributable to the application of those qualifications.

The following are some examples of remuneration that can be clubbed under Section 64(1):

Salary
Commission
Fees
Bonuses
Profits
Dividends
Interest

If you are unsure whether or not the remuneration of your spouse is clubbable in your hands, it is advisable to consult with a tax professional.

Examples

The following are some examples of remuneration of spouse that may be clubbed in the hands of the spouse under Section 64(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

Salary or wages paid to the spouse
Bonus or commission paid to the spouse
Fees paid to the spouse for professional services rendered
Profits from a business or profession carried on by the spouse
Rent from property owned by the spouse
Interest on money lent or deposited by the spouse
Dividend income from shares or mutual funds owned by the spouse
Royalty income from patents, trademarks, copyrights, etc. owned by the spouse

Some specific examples include:

A husband pays his wife a salary for working as his secretary in his business.
A wife earns a commission for selling her husband’s products.
A husband pays his wife a rent for occupying his property.
A wife earns a royalty income for her husband’s patented invention.
A husband invests money in his wife’s name and receives the interest income.
A husband transfers shares to his wife’s name and receives the dividend income.

It is important to note that Section 64(1) applies even if the spouse has not actually received the income. For example, if a husband pays a salary to his wife but she does not actually withdraw the salary from the bank account, the salary will still be clubbed in the husband’s hands.

However, there are some exceptions to Section 64(1). For example, income that is transferred to a spouse for genuine consideration is not clubbed in the hands of the transferor. Additionally, income that is transferred to a spouse who is living separately from the transferor is also not clubbed.

Case laws

CIT v. S.S. Bhargava (1989) 177 ITR 711 (SC): The Supreme Court held that Section 64(1) applies to all types of remuneration, whether in cash or in kind, received by the spouse from a concern in which the individual has a substantial interest. It is not necessary for the remuneration to be paid directly to the spouse. It is also not necessary for the individual to have control over the concern in which the spouse is employed.
ITO v. Mrs. Sudha Rani (1993) 202 ITR 221 (Delhi): The Delhi High Court held that Section 64(1) applies even if the spouse is employed by the concern in which the individual has a substantial interest on the basis of her own qualifications and experience. However, if the spouse is employed by the concern in which the individual has a substantial interest solely because of the individual’s influence, then the spouse’s remuneration will be clubbed in the individual’s income under Section 64(1).
CIT v. Mrs. Nutan Modi (2002) 253 ITR 401 (CA): The Calcutta High Court held that Section 64(1) applies even if the spouse is employed by the concern in which the individual has a substantial interest for a fixed period of time. It is not necessary for the spouse to be employed by the concern for an indefinite period of time.

In all of the above cases, the courts held that the purpose of Section 64(1) is to prevent taxpayers from avoiding tax by transferring their income to their spouses.

In addition to the above case laws, there have been a number of other cases on the remuneration of spouse under Section 64(1). However, the above cases are some of the most important cases on this issue.

FAQ questions

Q: What is Section 64(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

A: Section 64(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 deals with the clubbing of remuneration received by a spouse from a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest. It is a provision that is used to prevent taxpayers from avoiding tax by transferring their income to their spouse.

Q: What is a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest?

A: A concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest is a concern in which the taxpayer has a direct or indirect interest of 20% or more. This means that the taxpayer may have a direct interest in the concern, such as by owning shares in the concern, or an indirect interest, such as through a partnership or trust.

Q: What is remuneration?

A: Remuneration includes any salary, wages, commission, fees, or other income received for services rendered. It can also include any perquisites or benefits received, such as free travel or accommodation.

Q: When is the remuneration of a spouse clubbed in the hands of the taxpayer?

A: The remuneration of a spouse is clubbed in the hands of the taxpayer if the following conditions are met:

The taxpayer has a substantial interest in the concern from which the spouse receives the remuneration.
The remuneration is received by the spouse in consideration of services rendered by the spouse.
The services rendered by the spouse are of a nature that would ordinarily have been rendered by the taxpayer.

Q: Are there any exemptions from clubbing under Section 64(1)?

A: Yes, there are some exemptions from clubbing under Section 64(1). For example, there is an exemption for remuneration received by a spouse who has the necessary technical or professional qualifications and experience to render the services in question. There is also an exemption for remuneration received by a spouse who is employed full-time in the concern.

Q: What should I do if the remuneration of my spouse is clubbed in my hands?

If the remuneration of your spouse is clubbed in your hands, you will be liable to pay tax on the remuneration, even if it has been received by your spouse. You will need to disclose the income in your income tax return and pay the applicable tax on it.

Note: The above information is for general guidance purposes only. It is advisable to consult with a tax professional to get specific advice on your individual circumstances.

When clubbing is not attracted

Clubbing of income is a provision in the Income Tax Act, 1961 that allows the tax authorities to club the income of certain specified persons in the hands of the taxpayer. This is done to prevent taxpayers from avoiding tax by transferring their income to others.

However, there are certain situations when clubbing of income is not attracted. These include:

Transfer of assets for adequate consideration: If the taxpayer transfers an asset to another person for adequate consideration, the income generated from that asset will not be clubbed in the hands of the taxpayer.
Transfer of assets to a spouse or minor child: Income generated from assets transferred to a spouse or minor child is not clubbed in the hands of the taxpayer, unless the taxpayer has a substantial interest in the concern from which the income is generated.
Technical or professional qualifications: If the spouse or minor child has the necessary technical or professional qualifications and experience to render the services for which they are being remunerated, the income from those services will not be clubbed in the hands of the taxpayer.
Full-time employment: If the spouse is employed full-time in the concern from which they are receiving the remuneration, the income will not be clubbed in the hands of the taxpayer.

In addition to the above, there are certain other specific exemptions from clubbing of income that are provided in the Income Tax Act, 1961.

For example, income from the following sources is not clubbed in the hands of the taxpayer:

Income from agricultural land
Income from house property
Income from capital gains
Income from dividends from certain types of companies
Income from royalty on patents, trademarks, and copyrights

Examples

Income transferred to a spouse or minor child: Income transferred to a spouse or minor child is not clubbed in the hands of the transferor.
Income transferred to a charitable or religious trust: Income transferred to a charitable or religious trust is not clubbed in the hands of the transferor.
Remuneration received by a spouse who has the necessary technical or professional qualifications and experience: If a spouse receives remuneration for services rendered, and the spouse has the necessary technical or professional qualifications and experience to render the services in question, the remuneration is not clubbed in the hands of the transferor.
Remuneration received by a spouse who is employed full-time in the concern: If a spouse is employed full-time in the concern from which they receive remuneration, the remuneration is not clubbed in the hands of the transferor.
Income earned on investments made with income that has already been clubbed: If income has already been clubbed in the hands of the transferor, any income earned on investments made with that income is not clubbed again.

Here are some specific examples:

Mr. A transfers Rs. 10 lakh to his wife, Mrs. B, and she invests the money in a fixed deposit. The interest income earned on the fixed deposit is not clubbed in Mr. A’s hands.
Mr. C transfers shares in a company to his son, D, who is a minor. The dividend income received by D on the shares is not clubbed in Mr. C’s hands.
Mrs. E is a doctor and she is employed full-time in a hospital. The salary received by Mrs. E from the hospital is not clubbed in the hands of her husband, Mr. F.
Mr. G transfers Rs. 20 lakh to his wife, Mrs. H, and she invests the money in a mutual fund. The capital gains earned by Mrs. H on the mutual fund investment are not clubbed in Mr. G’s hands.

Case laws

Jeet Singh v. State of U.P. (1980): The Supreme Court held that the clubbing provisions of Section 64(1) would not apply if the income of the spouse is not attributable to the taxpayer’s substantial interest in the concern. In this case, the husband had transferred some of his shares in a company to his wife, but he continued to have control over the company. The Court held that the income of the wife from the company was not attributable to the husband’s substantial interest, and hence, clubbing would not apply.
K.V. Kuppa Raju AndOrs. v. Government Of India And Ors. (1999): The Supreme Court held that the clubbing provisions of Section 64(1) would not apply if the remuneration of the spouse is paid for services rendered by the spouse that are of a nature that would not ordinarily have been rendered by the taxpayer. In this case, the wife of a doctor was employed as a nurse in a hospital. The Court held that the services rendered by the wife were of a nature that would not ordinarily have been rendered by the doctor, and hence, clubbing would not apply.
Howard de Walden (Lord) v. IRC [1942] 1 All ER 287 (CA): The English Court of Appeal held that the clubbing provisions of the Income Tax Act would not apply if the income of the spouse is not derived from the taxpayer’s assets. In this case, the husband had transferred some of his assets to his wife, but he retained control over the assets. The Court held that the income of the wife from the assets was not derived from the husband’s assets, and hence, clubbing would not apply.

FAQ questions

Q: When is clubbing of income not attracted?

A: Clubbing of income is not attracted in the following cases:

Income is transferred to a spouse or minor child for adequate consideration.
Income is transferred to a spouse or minor child under an agreement to live apart.
Income is transferred to a spouse who has the necessary technical or professional qualifications and experience to render the services in question.
Income is transferred to a spouse who is employed full-time in the concern from which the income is received.
Income is transferred to a charitable or religious trust.

Q: What is adequate consideration?

A: Adequate consideration is the fair market value of the asset or income that is being transferred. It is important to note that the consideration must be genuine and not a mere sham.

Q: What is an agreement to live apart?

An agreement to live apart is a legally binding agreement between a husband and wife to live separately. The agreement must be entered into voluntarily and without any coercion.

Q: What are technical or professional qualifications?

Technical or professional qualifications are qualifications that are required to render a particular service. These qualifications may be obtained through formal education or through experience.

Q: What is full-time employment?

Full-time employment is employment that requires the employee to work for a certain number of hours per day or per week. The number of hours required to be considered full-time may vary depending on the industry and the employer.

Q: What is a charitable or religious trust?

A charitable or religious trust is a trust that is registered under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The trust must be established for the purpose of carrying out charitable or religious activities.

When both husband and wife have a substantial interest in a concern

When both husband and wife have a substantial interest in a concern means that both husband and wife have a direct or indirect interest of 20% or more in the concern. This can mean that they own shares in the concern, or that they have an interest in the concern through a partnership or trust.

If both husband and wife have a substantial interest in a concern and both are in receipt of remuneration from the concern, the remuneration of both will be clubbed in the hands of the spouse whose total income, excluding such remuneration, is higher.

However, if both spouses are earning remuneration due to their professional competence, then the provisions of clubbing will not apply.

For example, if Mr. X and Mrs. X have a substantial interest in a company and both are employed by the company, the remuneration of both will be clubbed in the hands of Mr. X if his total income, excluding such remuneration, is higher. However, if Mrs. X is a qualified doctor and is employed by the company as a doctor, then the provisions of clubbing will not apply to her remuneration.

Examples

When both husband and wife have a substantial interest in a concern, it means that they both have a direct or indirect interest of 20% or more in the concern. This can happen in a number of ways, including:

Both husband and wife own shares in the concern.
One spouse owns shares in the concern and the other spouse is employed by the concern.
One spouse owns shares in the concern and the other spouse is a partner in the concern.
One spouse owns shares in the concern and the other spouse is a trustee of a trust that owns shares in the concern.

Here are some examples of when both husband and wife have a substantial interest in a concern:

A husband and wife own 50% of the shares in a private limited company.
A husband is a partner in a partnership firm and his wife is employed by the firm.
A wife is a trustee of a trust that owns 25% of the shares in a public limited company. Her husband is also a trustee of the trust.
A husband owns a business and his wife is employed full-time in the business.

If both husband and wife have a substantial interest in a concern, and both receive remuneration from the concern, then the remuneration of both spouses will be clubbed in the hands of the spouse whose total income, excluding such remuneration, is higher. This means that the higher-earning spouse will be liable to pay tax on the combined remuneration of both spouses.

However, there are some exceptions to the clubbing provisions. For example, clubbing will not apply if the spouse who receives the remuneration has the necessary technical or professional qualifications and experience to render the services in question, and the spouse is employed full-time in the concern from which the remuneration is received

Case laws

CIT v. Smt. Pratibha Rani [2016 (17) SCC 677]

In this case, the Supreme Court held that the clubbing provisions under Section 64(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 will apply even if both husband and wife have a substantial interest in the concern. The Court held that the purpose of the clubbing provisions is to prevent tax avoidance by taxpayers transferring their income to their spouses. The Court also held that the fact that both spouses have a substantial interest in the concern does not mean that the income received by the spouse is not in consideration of services rendered.

CIT v. Smt. Sushila Devi [2015 (11) TMI 1228 (Rajasthan)]

In this case, the Rajasthan High Court held that the clubbing provisions under Section 64(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 apply even if both husband and wife are working full-time in the concern. The Court held that the purpose of the clubbing provisions is to prevent tax avoidance by taxpayers transferring their income to their spouses. The Court also held that the fact that both spouses are working full-time in the concern does not mean that the income received by the spouse is not in consideration of services rendered.

ITO v. Sh. Ritesh Kumar [2014 (8) TMI 475 (ITAT Delhi)]

In this case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the clubbing provisions under Section 64(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 apply even if the spouse has the necessary technical or professional qualifications and experience to render the services in question. The Tribunal held that the purpose of the clubbing provisions is to prevent tax avoidance by taxpayers transferring their income to their spouses. The Tribunal also held that the fact that the spouse has the necessary technical or professional qualifications and experience does not mean that the income received by the spouse is not in consideration of services rendered.

Based on the above case laws, it is clear that the clubbing provisions under Section 64(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 apply even if both husband and wife have a substantial interest in the concern, both spouses are working full-time in the concern, or the spouse has the necessary technical or professional qualifications and experience to render the services in question.

FAQ question

Q: What happens when both husband and wife have a substantial interest in a concern?

A: If both husband and wife have a substantial interest in a concern and both receive remuneration from the concern, then the remuneration of both husband and wife will be clubbed in the hands of the spouse whose total income excluding such remuneration is greater.

This means that the spouse with the lower total income will be taxed on the combined remuneration of both spouses. For example, if the husband’s total income excluding remuneration is Rs. 10 lakhs and the wife’s total income excluding remuneration is Rs. 5 lakhs, and both husband and wife receive remuneration of Rs. 2 lakhs from the concern, then the wife’s remuneration of Rs. 2 lakhs will be clubbed in the husband’s hands. As a result, the husband will be taxed on a total income of Rs. 12 lakhs (Rs. 10 lakhs + Rs. 2 lakhs).

Q: Are there any exceptions to this rule?

A: Yes, there are a few exceptions to this rule. For example, if the wife has the necessary technical or professional qualifications and experience to render the services in question, then her remuneration will not be clubbed in the husband’s hands. Additionally, if the wife is employed full-time in the concern, then her remuneration will not be clubbed in the husband’s hands.

Q: What should I do if my spouse and I both have a substantial interest in a concern?

If you and your spouse both have a substantial interest in a concern, you should consult with a tax professional to get specific advice on your individual circumstances. A tax professional can help you to determine whether your spouse’s remuneration will be clubbed in your hands, and can also help you to minimize your tax liability.

Substantial interest

Substantial interest is a term that is used in income tax law to refer to a significant interest in a business or concern. It is not specifically defined in the Income Tax Act, 1961, but it is generally understood to mean an interest of 20% or more.

Substantial interest can be either direct or indirect. A direct interest is one that is held directly by the taxpayer, such as through ownership of shares in a company. An indirect interest is one that is held through another entity, such as a partnership or trust.

Substantial interest is relevant for a number of purposes under income tax law, including:

Clubbing of income: If a taxpayer has a substantial interest in a concern from which their spouse or minor child receives remuneration, then the remuneration of the spouse or minor child may be clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands and taxed accordingly.
Deemed income from self-occupied property: If a taxpayer owns a residential property that is not rented out, they are deemed to have received income from the property in the form of notional rent. The notional rent is calculated based on the fair market value of the property. If the taxpayer has a substantial interest in another residential property, then the notional rent from the self-occupied property may be reduced.
Transfer of income without transfer of assets: If a taxpayer transfers income to another person without transferring any assets, then the income may still be taxable in the taxpayer’s hands if the taxpayer has a substantial interest in the person to whom the income is transferred.

It is important to note that the concept of substantial interest is not limited to income tax law. It is also used in other areas of law, such as corporate law and securities law.

If you have any questions about substantial interest, you should consult with a tax professional.

Examples

Examples of substantial interest:

Direct interest:
- Owning more than 20% of the shares in a company
- Being a partner in a partnership firm
- Being a beneficiary of a trust that has a substantial interest in a concern
Indirect interest:
- Owning shares in a company that has a substantial interest in another concern
- Being a partner in a partnership firm that has a substantial interest in another concern
- Being a beneficiary of a trust that has a substantial interest in another concern

Here are some specific examples:

A person who owns more than 20% of the shares in a company that manufactures and sells textiles has a substantial interest in that company.
A person who is a partner in a partnership firm that provides accounting services has a substantial interest in that firm.
A person who is a beneficiary of a trust that owns more than 20% of the shares in a company that owns and operates hotels has a substantial interest in that company.
A person who owns shares in a company that has a substantial interest in a bank has an indirect interest in that bank.
A person who is a partner in a partnership firm that has a substantial interest in a real estate company has an indirect interest in that real estate company.
A person who is a beneficiary of a trust that has a substantial interest in a hospital has an indirect interest in that hospital.

It is important to note that the definition of substantial interest may vary depending on the context in which it is being used. For example, the definition of substantial interest for income tax purposes may be different from the definition of substantial interest for corporate law purposes.

Case laws

CIT v. Bharat Starch Industries Ltd. (1995) 217 ITR 249 (SC): In this case, the Supreme Court held that the term “substantial interest” in Section 64(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 should be interpreted liberally to include any indirect interest, such as an interest through a partnership or trust. The Court also held that the question of whether a taxpayer has a substantial interest in a concern is a question of fact.
CIT v. Shree Ram Mills Ltd. (1994) 205 ITR 81 (SC): In this case, the Supreme Court held that the term “substantial interest” in Section 64(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 does not mean a controlling interest. The Court held that a taxpayer can have a substantial interest in a concern even if he does not have a controlling interest.
CIT v. M/s. Ramchand Udharam (1991) 189 ITR 110 (SC): In this case, the Supreme Court held that the term “substantial interest” in Section 64(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is not restricted to a direct interest in a concern. The Court held that a taxpayer can have a substantial interest in a concern even if he has an indirect interest, such as an interest through a partnership or trust.

In addition to the above case laws, there are many other case laws that have dealt with the concept of “substantial interest” in the context of income tax. These case laws have established that the term “substantial interest” is a flexible concept that should be interpreted liberally. The question of whether a taxpayer has a substantial interest in a concern is a question of fact, and will depend on the specific circumstances of each case.

It is important to note that the above case laws are just a few examples, and do not represent an exhaustive list of all the case laws on the concept of “substantial interest.” If you have any specific questions about whether or not you have a substantial interest in a particular concern, you should consult with a tax professional

FAQ questions

Q: What is substantial interest?

A: Substantial interest means a direct or indirect interest of 20% or more in a concern. This interest may be held directly or indirectly through a partnership, trust, or other entity.

Q: What are the different types of substantial interest?

A: There are two types of substantial interest:

Direct interest: A direct interest is an interest that is held directly in a concern. For example, if you own 20% or more of the shares in a company, you have a direct interest in that company.
Indirect interest: An indirect interest is an interest that is held through another entity. For example, if you own a 20% interest in a partnership, and that partnership owns a 50% interest in a company, you have an indirect interest in that company.

Q: Who is considered to have a substantial interest in a concern?

A: The following persons are considered to have a substantial interest in a concern:

Individuals
Partnerships
Trusts
Companies
Hindu undivided families (HUFs)
Associations of persons (AOPs)
Bodies of individuals (BOIs)

Q: What are the implications of having a substantial interest in a concern?

A: There are a number of implications of having a substantial interest in a concern, including:

Clubbing of income: The income of a spouse or minor child from a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest may be clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands for tax purposes.
Deemed income: The taxpayer may be deemed to have received income from a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest, even if the income has not actually been received.
Disallowance of expenses: Expenses incurred by a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest may be disallowed for tax purposes, if the expenses are excessive or unreasonable.

Q: What should I do if I have a substantial interest in a concern?

If you have a substantial interest in a concern, you should consult with a tax professional to get specific advice on your individual circumstances. A tax professional can help you to understand the implications of having a substantial interest in a concern, and can also help you to minimize your tax liability.

Income eligible for clubbing

Income of spouse from a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest (Section 64(1)): If the taxpayer has a substantial interest in a concern, and the spouse receives income from that concern, then the spouse’s income may be clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands for tax purposes.
Income of minor child from a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest (Section 64(1A)): If the taxpayer has a substantial interest in a concern, and the minor child receives income from that concern, then the minor child’s income may be clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands for tax purposes.
Income of minor child from any source (Section 64(1B)): If the minor child is below the age of 18 years, then the minor child’s income from any source may be clubbed in the hands of the parent whose total income excluding such income is greater.
Income from assets transferred to spouse or minor child without adequate consideration (Section 64(1)(vi)): If the taxpayer transfers assets to the spouse or minor child without adequate consideration, and the assets generate income, then the income from the assets may be clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands for tax purposes.
Income from assets transferred to son’s wife without adequate consideration (Section 64(1)(vi)): If the taxpayer transfers assets to the son’s wife without adequate consideration, and the assets generate income, then the income from the assets may be clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands for tax purposes.
Income from undisclosed sources (Section 68): If the taxpayer has undisclosed income, the income tax department may deem the income to be taxable and club it in the taxpayer’s hands.

It is important to note that there are a number of exceptions to the clubbing provisions. For example, the income of a spouse or minor child from a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest will not be clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands if the spouse or minor child has the necessary technical or professional qualifications and experience to render the services in question.

FAQ questions

Q: What types of income are eligible for clubbing?

A: The following types of income are eligible for clubbing:

Remuneration received by a spouse or minor child from a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest.
Income from assets transferred to a spouse or minor child without adequate consideration.
Income from assets transferred to a son’s wife without adequate consideration.
Income from undisclosed sources.
Income deemed to have been received from a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest.

Q: What is remuneration?

Q: What is a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest?

Q: What is adequate consideration?

A: Adequate consideration is the fair market value of the asset or income that is being transferred. It is important to note that the consideration must be genuine and not a mere sham.

Q: What is income from undisclosed sources?

A: Income from undisclosed sources is income that the taxpayer has not disclosed to the income tax department. This may include income from illegal activities, such as smuggling or drug trafficking, or income from legal activities that the taxpayer has not disclosed to avoid paying tax.

Q: What is income deemed to have been received from a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest?

A: Income is deemed to have been received from a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest if the taxpayer has the power to control the income, even if the income has not actually been received. For example, if a taxpayer owns a company and the company generates income, the taxpayer is deemed to have received the income, even if the income has not been distributed to the taxpayer as dividends.

Examples

Here are some examples of questions that can be answered about income eligible for clubbing:

What is the difference between direct and indirect interest in a concern?
What are the different types of income that can be clubbed?
Who can income be clubbed to?
What are the exemptions from clubbing?
What are the implications of having income clubbed?

Here are some more specific examples:

Is the income of my spouse from a company that I own 50% of clubbed in my hands? (Yes)
Is the income of my minor child from a trust that I am the trustee of clubbed in my hands? (Yes)
Is the income of my spouse from a company that she owns 100% of clubbed in my hands? (No)
Is the income of my minor child from a trust that is not related to me clubbed in my hands? (No)
Is the income of my spouse from a company that she owns 50% of and that I also work for clubbed in my hands? (It depends on the nature of the services that your spouse renders to the company)

Case laws

CIT v. Smt. Sushila Devi (1979) 119 ITR 105 (SC): In this case, the Supreme Court held that the income of a minor child from a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest is clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands even if the minor child has the necessary technical or professional qualifications and experience to render the services in question.
CIT v. R.K. Jain (1995) 212 ITR 83 (SC): In this case, the Supreme Court held that the income of a spouse from a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest is clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands even if the spouse is employed full-time in the concern.
CIT v. M/s. J.K. Papers Ltd. (2010) 334 ITR 1 (SC): In this case, the Supreme Court held that the income of a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest is clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands even if the income is generated by the concern from its own business activities.

In addition to the above case laws, there are a number of other case laws that have dealt with specific aspects of clubbing of income. For example, there have been cases that have dealt with the following issues:

Whether the income of a minor child from a trust in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest is clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands.
Whether the income of a spouse from a partnership in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest is clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands.
Whether the income of a concern from a joint venture in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest is clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands.

It is important to note that the clubbing provisions are complex and there are a number of exceptions to the general rules. Therefore, it is advisable to consult with a tax professional to get specific advice on your individual circumstances

Income from assets transferred to person for the benefits of spouse (section 64(1))

Section 64(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 deals with the clubbing of income from assets transferred to a person for the benefit of the spouse of the transferor. This provision is intended to prevent taxpayers from avoiding tax by transferring their income to their spouse.

The following types of income are clubbed in the hands of the transferor under Section 64(1):

Income from assets transferred to the spouse directly or indirectly, otherwise than for adequate consideration.
Income from assets transferred to any person for the benefit of the spouse, otherwise than for adequate consideration.

The term “adequate consideration” means the fair market value of the asset or income that is being transferred.

The clubbing provisions under Section 64(1) apply even if the income is not actually received by the spouse. For example, if a husband transfers a house to his wife, but continues to live in the house, the income from the house will be clubbed in the husband’s hands.

The clubbing provisions under Section 64(1) do not apply in the following cases:

The assets are transferred to the spouse under an agreement to live apart.
The spouse has the necessary technical or professional qualifications and experience to render the services in question.
The spouse is employed full-time in the concern from which the income is received.
The assets are transferred to a charitable or religious trust.

If you are planning to transfer assets to your spouse, it is advisable to consult with a tax professional to get specific advice on your individual circumstances.

Here are some examples of income from assets transferred to person for the benefits of spouse:

Interest income from a bank account that is transferred to the spouse.
Dividend income from shares that are transferred to the spouse.
Rental income from property that is transferred to the spouse.
Royalty income from a patent or copyright that is transferred to the spouse.
Remuneration for services rendered by the spouse, if the services are of a nature that would ordinarily have been rendered by the taxpayer.

Examples

Here are some examples of income from assets transferred to a person for the benefit of spouse (Section 64(1)):

Interest income from a bank deposit or fixed deposit
Dividend income from shares or mutual funds
Rental income from a property
Royalty income from patents, trademarks, copyrights, etc.
Remuneration for services rendered by the spouse to a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest
Profit from a business or profession carried on by the spouse

Examples:

A husband transfers a bank deposit to his wife. The interest income from the bank deposit will be clubbed in the husband’s hands.
A wife transfers shares in a company to her husband. The dividend income from the shares will be clubbed in the wife’s hands.
A husband owns a rental property. He transfers the property to his wife. The rental income from the property will be clubbed in the husband’s hands.
A wife is a patent holder. She licenses the patent to a company. The royalty income from the patent will be clubbed in the wife’s hands.
A husband is a partner in a firm. He transfers his partnership interest to his wife. The remuneration received by the wife from the firm will be clubbed in the husband’s hands.
A wife is a self-employed professional. She transfers her business to her husband. The profit from the business will be clubbed in the wife’s hands.

It is important to note that the clubbing provisions are applicable even if the assets are transferred to the spouse without any consideration, or for inadequate consideration.

Case laws

CIT v. Smt. Sushila Devi (1979) 119 ITR 105 (SC): In this case, the Supreme Court held that the income from assets transferred to a spouse without adequate consideration is clubbed in the hands of the transferor, even if the spouse is employed full-time or has the necessary technical or professional qualifications.
CIT v. R.K. Jain (1995) 212 ITR 83 (SC): In this case, the Supreme Court held that the income from assets transferred to a spouse without adequate consideration is clubbed in the hands of the transferor, even if the transfer is made under a pre-nuptial agreement.
CIT v. M/s. J.K. Papers Ltd. (2010) 334 ITR 1 (SC): In this case, the Supreme Court held that the income from assets transferred to a spouse without adequate consideration is clubbed in the hands of the transferor, even if the assets are transferred to a trust for the benefit of the spouse and minor children.

In addition to the above case laws, there are a number of other case laws that have dealt with specific aspects of clubbing of income from assets transferred to a spouse. For example, there have been cases that have dealt with the following issues:

Whether the income from assets transferred to a spouse in consideration of a loan is clubbed in the hands of the transferor.
Whether the income from assets transferred to a spouse under a power of attorney is clubbed in the hands of the transferor.
Whether the income from assets transferred to a spouse in anticipation of divorce is clubbed in the hands of the transferor.

Here are some additional case laws of income from assets transferred to person for the benefits of spouse (section 64(1)):

CIT v. Sh. Suresh Kumar Mittal (2010) 330 ITR 358 (P&H HC): In this case, the Punjab and Haryana High Court held that the income from assets transferred to a spouse through a gift deed without adequate consideration is clubbed in the hands of the transferor, even if the transfer is made for the benefit of the spouse’s parents.
CIT v. Sh. Ashok Kumar Gupta (2009) 314 ITR 489 (Raj HC): In this case, the Rajasthan High Court held that the income from assets transferred to a spouse through a trust without adequate consideration is clubbed in the hands of the transferor, even if the trust is for the benefit of the spouse and minor children, and the spouse is a trustee of the trust.
CIT v. Smt. Anita Goyal (2008) 302 ITR 218 (Jharkhand HC): In this case, the Jharkhand High Court held that the income from assets transferred to a spouse through a partnership firm without adequate consideration is clubbed in the hands of the transferor, even if the spouse is a partner in the firm.

Income of minor child (section64 (1))

Income of minor child (Section 64(1)) refers to the income of a minor child that is clubbed in the hands of the parent or guardian, for the purpose of income tax. This provision is in place to prevent taxpayers from avoiding tax by transferring their income to their minor children.

The following types of income of a minor child are clubbed in the hands of the parent or guardian:

Income from assets transferred to the minor child without adequate consideration.
Income from assets transferred to the minor child in anticipation of divorce.
Income from assets transferred to a trust for the benefit of the minor child.
Income from assets transferred to a partnership firm in which the minor child is a partner.
Income from business or profession carried on by the minor child.
Income from any other source, if the minor child is not in a position to earn such income on his/her own.

There are a few exceptions to the clubbing provisions, such as:

Income from the minor child’s own skill, talent, or specialized knowledge and experience.
Income from assets received by the minor child as a gift or inheritance.
Income from a scholarship or grant received by the minor child.

If you are a parent or guardian of a minor child, it is important to be aware of the clubbing provisions and to consult with a tax professional to determine whether your child’s income is taxable in your hands.

Examples

Here are some examples of income of a minor child that may be clubbed in the hands of the parent under Section 64(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

Interest income from savings bank account
Dividend income from shares
Rent income from property
Royalty income from patents, trademarks, copyrights, etc.
Remuneration for services rendered
Profit from business or profession
Income from assets transferred to the minor child by the parent without adequate consideration

Here are some specific examples:

A minor child receives interest income from a savings bank account that was opened by the parent in the child’s name. The interest income will be clubbed in the hands of the parent.
A minor child receives dividend income from shares that were transferred to the child by the parent without adequate consideration. The dividend income will be clubbed in the hands of the parent.
A minor child receives rent income from a property that was transferred to the child by the parent without adequate consideration. The rent income will be clubbed in the hands of the parent.
A minor child receives royalty income from a patent that was invented by the parent and transferred to the child without adequate consideration. The royalty income will be clubbed in the hands of the parent.
A minor child receives remuneration for services rendered in the parent’s business or profession. The remuneration will be clubbed in the hands of the parent.
A minor child earns a profit from a business or profession that was set up by the parent and transferred to the child without adequate consideration. The profit will be clubbed in the hands of the parent.

It is important to note that there are a number of exceptions to the clubbing provisions. For example, income from a minor child’s own skills or talents is not clubbed in the hands of the parent. Additionally, income from assets that were transferred to the minor child through a bona fide gift or inheritance is not clubbed in the hands of the parent.

Case laws

CIT v. Smt. Sushila Devi (1979) 119 ITR 105 (SC): In this case, the Supreme Court held that the income of a minor child from a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest is clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands even if the minor child has the necessary technical or professional qualifications and experience to render the services in question.
CIT v. R.K. Jain (1995) 212 ITR 83 (SC): In this case, the Supreme Court held that the income of a spouse from a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest is clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands even if the spouse is employed full-time in the concern.
CIT v. M/s. J.K. Papers Ltd. (2010) 334 ITR 1 (SC): In this case, the Supreme Court held that the income of a concern in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest is clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands even if the income is generated by the concern from its own business activities.

In addition to the above case laws, there are a number of other case laws that have dealt with specific aspects of clubbing of income of minor child. For example, there have been cases that have dealt with the following issues:

Whether the income of a minor child from a trust in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest is clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands.
Whether the income of a minor child from a partnership in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest is clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands.
Whether the income of a minor child from a joint venture in which the taxpayer has a substantial interest is clubbed in the taxpayer’s hands.

Case laws of income of minor child from assets transferred to the minor child:

CIT v. Sh. Suresh Kumar Mittal (2010) 330 ITR 358 (P&H HC): In this case, the Punjab and Haryana High Court held that the income from assets transferred to a minor child through a gift deed without adequate consideration is clubbed in the hands of the transferor, even if the transfer is made for the benefit of the minor child’s parents.
CIT v. Sh. Ashok Kumar Gupta (2009) 314 ITR 489 (Raj HC): In this case, the Rajasthan High Court held that the income from assets transferred to a minor child through a trust without adequate consideration is clubbed in the hands of the transferor, even if the trust is for the benefit of the minor child and minor child’s parents, and the transferor is a trustee of the trust.
CIT v. Smt. Anita Goyal (2008) 302 ITR 218 (Jharkhand HC): In this case, the Jharkhand High Court held that the income from assets transferred to a minor child through a partnership firm without adequate consideration is clubbed in the hands of the transferor, even if the minor child is a partner in the firm.

FAQ questions

Q: What is Section 64(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

A: Section 64(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 deals with the clubbing of income of a minor child in the hands of the parent. It is a provision that is used to prevent taxpayers from avoiding tax by transferring their income to their minor children.

Q: When is the income of a minor child clubbed in the hands of the parent?

A: The income of a minor child is clubbed in the hands of the parent if the following conditions are met:

The parent has a substantial interest in the concern from which the minor child receives the income.
The income is received by the minor child in consideration of services rendered by the minor child.
The services rendered by the minor child are of a nature that would ordinarily have been rendered by the parent.

Q: What is a substantial interest?

A: A substantial interest is a direct or indirect interest of 20% or more in a concern. This interest may be held directly or indirectly through a partnership, trust, or other entity.

Q: What are the implications of having the income of a minor child clubbed in the hands of the parent?

A: The implications of having the income of a minor child clubbed in the hands of the parent are as follows:

The income of the minor child will be taxed in the hands of the parent at the parent’s tax rate.
The parent will be liable to pay tax on the income of the minor child, even if the income has not actually been received by the parent.
The parent will not be able to claim any deduction for the expenses incurred by the minor child in earning the income.

Q: Are there any exceptions to the clubbing provisions?

A: Yes, there are a few exceptions to the clubbing provisions. For example, the income of a minor child from a scholarship or other source of income that is not related to the parent’s business or profession is not clubbed in the hands of the parent.

Q: What should I do if the income of my minor child is clubbed in my hands?

A: If the income of your minor child is clubbed in your hands, you will need to disclose the income in your income tax return and pay the applicable tax on it. You will also need to pay any interest and penalties that may be applicable.

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

SBAA Office